Tintin Forums

Tintinologist.org Forums / Tintin books /

The Calculus Affair: The red dress woman and husband

Page  Page 2 of 2:  « Previous  1  2 

Balthazar
Moderator
#11 · Posted: 16 Dec 2011 17:07
jcjlf:
This woman was already there in the Cigars of the Pharaoh! Probably she was then married to another man, much smaller and stouter as you can see on p.38.
I don't know the name of the couple in the English translation, but it could be Snowball, as in the Dutch version.

Yes, the name's Snowball in the English translation too.

I like your theory, jcjlf! She does look quite similar (even if, as mct says, Hergé may not have been intended her to be the same person).

jcjlf:
I suppose that after a conviction and doing time in India, she divorced and remarried a much more law-abiding and more conventional husband.

Given her mysterious trip to Borduria though, and the fact that she seems to be stalking Tintin generally, I don't think she's necessarily settled into a law-abiding life since The Cigars of the Pharaoh. I agree with mct that maybe she's become spy. Or Is her new husband another criminal, with whom she bumped off Mr Snowball? Maybe her new husband/lover is actually the Fakir (who, as someone pointed out recently in another thread escapes at the start of The Blue Lotus and is never reported as being recaptured) who's undergone drastic cosmetic surgery.

mct16:
the man addresses the woman with the formal "vous", which is the way you would normally address a stranger rather than someone to whom you are married.

To make that interesting observation fit my bonkers theory, I'd suggest that the disguised Fakir is controlling her, and insists on her addressing him with vous.

To get back to what Hergé probably intended, though, maybe this use of vous was a deliberate satirical jibe at the cold, respectable formality of the bourgeois married couple he was portraying. Maybe they represented his fear of what he and his first wife, Germaine, were becoming!

mct16:
Tintin and Haddock do address each other as "vous" all the time

That's very interesting. Possibly worth its own separate thread if we're going to unravel possible reasons for that.

Anyway, if Mrs Snowball is the red dress woman, she must age even better than Tintin does, as I think she actually looks younger in 1950s Europe than she does in 1930s India. Maybe she takes the same reverse-ageing pills as General Alcazar seems to take between his appearances in the books!

(Though of course the chronology of Cigars of the Pharaoh is quite odd anyway, what with Explorers on the Moon appearing in the sheikh's tent.)
mct16
Member
#12 · Posted: 16 Dec 2011 19:40
Balthazar:
Maybe her new husband/lover is actually the Fakir... who's undergone drastic cosmetic surgery.

Tintin's enemies have a habit of changing their names: Boris becomes Jorgen, Muller becomes Smith, Rastapopoulos becomes di Gorgonzola. Now you're suggesting the Fakir changed his nose, height and race!

I'd have hated being the surgeon who would had to have performed such an operation.
jcjlf
Member
#13 · Posted: 18 Dec 2011 19:15
Of course there are more theories on this site than intentions from the artists in Tintin. Maybe they were a little lazy, maybe just giving a wink-of-the-eye to true followers. But let's go on:

1) The fakir never showed up again. Hergé could not use him anywhere, so he was transformed into a similar villain who lived in the Naja Valley.

2) Jock123 almost convinced me about the spying couple, saying:
"I think the husband of your couple may also be looking warily over Haddock’s shoulder in frame 3 on the same page." Indeed it look if he is eavesdropping.
But why, after failing in Borduria, they just spend their evenings in B-Western movies (Red Sea Sharks, p.1)? No more duties? Not interested anymore in Tintin and Haddock? Not willing to work for Rastapopoulos?
Balthazar
Moderator
#14 · Posted: 18 Dec 2011 22:57
jcjlf:
But why, after failing in Borduria, they just spend their evenings in B-Western movies (Red Sea Sharks, p.1)?

Ah, but are they simply spending an innocent evening at the cinema? Perhaps they shadowed Tintin and Haddock to the cinema, as part of their general duties of keeping them under surveillance. Or maybe they were lurking in the cinema ready to in intercept and follow General Alcazar.

Page  Page 2 of 2:  « Previous  1  2 

Please be sure to familiarize yourself with the Forum Posting Guidelines.

Disclaimer: Tintinologist.org assumes no responsibility for any content you post to the forums/web site. Staff reserve the right to remove any submitted content which they deem in breach of Tintinologist.org's Terms of Use. If you spot anything on Tintinologist.org that you think is inappropriate, please alert the moderation team. Sometimes things slip through, but we will always act swiftly to remove unauthorised material.

Reply

|

» Login  » Password  Forgot your password?
Please log in to to post. No account? Sign up for one!

 

Online now: 2 guests and 0 members
Members online:

Most users ever online was 140 on 31 May 2013 22:04: 140 guests and 0 members

Load time: 0.397