Tintin Forums

Tintinologist.org Forums / Curious about Tintin? /

Location of Marlinspike Hall

 Page Page 3 of 3:  ««  1  2  3 
jock123
Moderator
#21 · Posted: 4 Dec 2006 13:13 · Edited by: jock123
the strip's creator, (the great Dudley D Watkins)
I actually was surprised on searching the forums just now that the great Dudley D. doesn’t seem to feature, although I could have sworn that I’d actually posted about him before in a discussion with tybaltstone about proto-clear line artists...

My fudging of the attribution was simply because I couldn’t recall if he was the creator or not - I wince when I see Alfred Bestall attributed as the creator of Rupert for example, so I erred on the side of caution!
I agree that he may not get the recognition he deserves, but on the other hand, he did have the distinction of being an artist who got to sign his strips, and The Sunday Post was still cycling his original stories on Oor Wullie and The Broons well into the seventies, when Ken Harrison took over I think (Alan Morley also got to sign his Hungry Horace, Keyhole Kate and Nero and Zero strips too).

By the by, Black Bob wasn’t a Watkins creation, it started as a text-story series, which only later developed into the strip illustrated by (Wikipedia tells me) Jack Prout, a name I didn’t know, but who’s art was superb.
Balthazar
Member
#22 · Posted: 4 Dec 2006 14:52
jock 123
Black Bob wasn’t a Watkins creation
I stand corrected - sorry and thanks!

jock 123
My fudging of the attribution was simply because I couldn't recall if he was the creator or not - I wince when I see Alfred Bestall attributed as the creator of Rupert for example, so I erred on the side of caution!
I know what you mean, though in this case I'm pretty sure that Watkins did create as well as draw Desperate Dan. In the very earliest strips Dan is a stumpy little tough guy (not so unlike Hergé's earliest version of Tintin) - a long way from the well-meaning, domestic, pie-loving character Watkins quite quickly developed him into.

jock 123
...he did have the distinction of being an artist who got to sign his strips, and The Sunday Post was still cycling his original stories on Oor Wullie and The Broons well into the seventies...

A nice perk for Dudley, but the fact that artists had to obtain special permission to sign their own work as a highly unusual privillege shows just how feudal the situation in British comics (and at that publisher in particular) was. And, with the publisher owning the copyright on all his hard work (as well as the original pieces of artwork), they didn't have to pay any royalties or repeat fees (I'd guess) to Watkins' estate when they endlessly republished his work after his death. They certainly held his work in the highest esteem - not only had Watkins been largely responsible for making their comics succesful when he was alive; they could continue to use his work to boost their company's reputation and profits after he was dead, with the very appealing bonus of no longer having to pay properly for it.

Hergé managed to die famous, at a reasonably good age after a relaxed semi-retirement (having stopped overworking after Tintin in Tibet), with his estate inheriting the valuable rights to his work. None of this can be said of Dudley D Watkins, sadly. (He died too young at his drawing board, in the middle of producing a strip - one of the gruelling number of pages he produced for DC Thompson every week.)

A while back, I heard some marketing person from DC Thompson on the radio promoting their latest desperate publicity-seeking "makeover" of Desperate Dan (which is terrible by the way). The presenter asked him who had originally created Desperate Dan, and the DC Thompson spokesman said he had no idea. And he said he had no idea in a jokey, offhand way that made it clear that no one would be expected to know such an archaic, irrelevant fact (even though Watkins' creations and rerprinted work were still paying for a large part of his salary).

To be fair, DC Thompson's books of reprinted Watkins work, such as a recent collection of 1950s vintage Oor Wullie and Broons strips I've got, do pay a little bit more respect and acknowledgement to Watkins than that. But you see my general point, I'm sure.

Have I gone just a little bit off-topic?
jock123
Moderator
#23 · Posted: 4 Dec 2006 17:19 · Edited by: jock123
Balthazar
I'm pretty sure that Watkins did create as well as draw Desperate Dan
He drew Wullie and The Broons from characters created by RD Low of DC Thompsons, so it is possible that they may be Low’s as well, but I only mention that for information, not to disagree with you as I just don’t know. Ron Low, RD Low’s son is said to be the model for Wullie, and his pal “Soupy” Souter the model for “Soapy” Souter in the strip (subtle change of name, isn’t it?).

To steer the creaking thread back on track, I would say that Watkins’ work has some of the same problems as Hergé; he was himself Mancunian, and lived in Nottinghamshire, yet drew Scottish strips for a Dundee company about families which live in or near Glasgow (in the fictional Auchentogle).
The east-coast writers in Dundee often mixed up dialect and local references (for example the youngest Broon child is called “The Bairn”, an east-coast dialect word, when she should have been called “The Wean” (The Wee One) in Glasgow). He appear to have used local reference material, as trams and buses sometimes have Dundee destination boards, not west coast ones. He did move to Broughty Ferry (just outside Dundee), so he may have also included things he saw there. To add to the confusion, Cactusville, the mythical Wild west home of Desperate Dan, looks more or less like Auchentogle, save for the addition of the odd horse-trough, tie-bar and cactus…
So it is really not possible to say where Auchentogle is, with any more certainty than Moulinsart/ Marlinspike.
Harrock n roll
Moderator
#24 · Posted: 4 Dec 2006 20:12 · Edited by: Harrock n roll
Balthazar
I think a slightly tweaked, re-Belgianized English translation would be a great idea for our more Europe-friendly 21st century
I think it would certainly be useful to explain the reasons behind why certain changes were made to the English editions and what effects they had, perhaps within the books themselves as a foreword. I suppose the kids of today could at least learn something about the original cultural and historical contexts as well as the slightly Victorian attitudes that still prevailed within English-language publishing back in the 50s. And of course, it would keep both the ‘Franco-Belgian-purists’ and the ‘Marlinspikers’ happy!

Incidentally, here’s a related thread from last year
Tintin: official postal address.
 Page Page 3 of 3:  ««  1  2  3 

Please be sure to familiarize yourself with the Forum Posting Guidelines.

Disclaimer: Tintinologist.org assumes no responsibility for any content you post to the forums/web site. Staff reserve the right to remove any submitted content which they deem in breach of Tintinologist.org's Terms of Use. If you spot anything on Tintinologist.org that you think is inappropriate, please alert the moderation team. Sometimes things slip through, but we will always act swiftly to remove unauthorised material.

Reply

|

» Login  » Password  Forgot your password?
Please log in to to post. No account? Sign up for one!
 



Online now: 3 guests and 0 members
Members online:

Most users ever online was 243 on 30 Oct 2009 05:04: 243 guests and 0 members



Load time: 0.089
Forums powered by miniBB™ © 2001-2010