Amilah Member
|
#64 · Posted: 3 Apr 2009 17:49
Agree AND disagree. Those hell/paradise things (with horned red devils, and big white bearded saints on clouds) are pretty naive, and quite childish. They are frequent in Quick & Flupke comics, where they're never too shocking, mostly because Quick & Flupke is quite silly and surreal in the first place : it's gags, not meant to be taken seriously. The first Tintin adventures were not too serious either (diving suit in prison cell, trumpet communication with elephants, etc), and the Ear is a bit in this phase of transition between silliness and realism.
What I'm getting at is that, yes, that scene is freaky. But not because it doesn't fit a "children book". On the contrary, the same scene, in a lighter book, would not shock as much. What makes it disturbing, is that it happens in an already semi-realistic, semi-adult world. It makes it feel both more "alien" and more "real".
To take a tangent : "Doom" was a videogame about a gate to hell being opened on Mars, and it has been turned into a movie about mutants outbreak and DNA modifications. Now, I'm not a fan of either the games or the movie, but it made me think. It made me realise that we're a bit jaded when it comes to these mutant DNA giger-based monsters, now so typical of sci-fi thrillers, and the "Doom" game's strength was coming from the old-school medieval iconography's irruption in a sci-fi environment. I do believe there is some unexploited power in classic 'naive' demonic imagery, precisely because it doesn't fit in our modern world - there would be some horror in the irruption of devils looking as we used to "rightly" depict them in medieval times, "after all !". It would tap simultaneously in childhood fears, and in the credibility of the unexpected. In fact, the unexpected "too expectable" is a genre I love (and has been, so far, mostly exploited in comedy : like Tim Burton's "Mars Attacks" or Fredric Brown's "Martians go home"), and I think its impact has some nightmarish horror potential.
To come back to Tintin, I think that's what happens in that panel. Devils come to claim souls "after all", in a setting that make us believe in the reality -or credibility- what we read. Not any kind of devils, but the traditional ones, which implies that "all the rest" is real as well (eternal punishment in big cauldrons, etc). The "it's real after all" impact is what makes the scene so traumatic. In a real children book, we'd be expecting it as part of the "stories told to children", and it wouldn't have the same impact.
Anyway, that's the angle through which that scene hits me, I think.
|