Just look for it. ... it's true he doesn't like the soviets.
I'm afraid that, given Shivam's and my evidence against that, you'll have
to give us sources if you want your argument against Soviets
to properly stand.
I agree with this statement. so they basically breaking his rules.
Again, you're twisting the truth to fit your own statements. Alph-Art
is entirely a different issue - since Alph-Art
was left uncompleted, lots of unauthorised artists tried their hand at finishing it. However, the black-and-white Congo
was definitely finished and they aren't changing the plot, but there's an authorised colour edition being issued. How is it breaking his rules?
Why are you yelling? i said it's perfectly fine you don't get it.
I wanted to say that when you said a statement, I made an example to counter it, then you bent my point so it fitted your opinions and commented that I said the correct thing, then I said that you were the one who did not get my point
, and now you're accusing me of "not getting it" when you still haven't told me how I didn't get it, even after I aked you, whilst you were the one who didn't get it in the first place.
If you hadn't made a strawman of my statement, then I wouldn't have yelled.
snowybella [and Shivam] got a lot to learn, really sad time, smh, etc. etc.
I love your compliments, Mister-who-knows-it-all-and-is-never-wrong-even-when-the-truth-stares- at-him-in-the-face. Maybe you can sing me the stanza from Gounod's Faust
that Castafiore always sings?
i don't know how old are you
I don't know how old you are either, but judging by your awful grammar (mentioned in marsbar
's post below), continual insistence, subtle name-calling and the inability to present sources, I think you aren't much older than I am.
Thank you for specifying!
back in these day it was the law to draw africans or anyone who wasn't caucasian like this. not only that but make them stupid and other things.
Incidentally, that action was done to make sure that racism, colonising countries, etc. was justifiable ("oh dear look at those poor people needing our help", etc.), when it obviously isn't at all.
you can read the blue lotus to get better explained.
I am proud to say that I have read all 24 of the books, have read the introduction (in the English edition) to it, read the real history behind it, am learning Chinese, have read at least 5 Herge biographies explaining how important that book is, and viewed the comments of this forum's members saying how he began to research other countries properly afterwards, but thank you for the recommendation all the same!
so believe what you want you guys. you two got a lot to learn.
Saying that with nothing to back up your statements is on the verge of provoking. Why
can't you give us sources? Why
do you keep saying things like that? Why
can't you say to our arguments "wow, I didn't know that", or properly challenge it as "well, that's interesting, but as this book says..."?
You probably think that you sound good and smart saying that we have a lot to learn, but in fact, it makes you sound like a fool, as marsbar
aptly put it below.
I'm afraid to say that you're the one that has a lot to learn...
--Note from Moderator marsbar:
Do you realise that some of your comments in this post come across as unkind and rude as some of iluvtintin's? I understand you were upset, but please keep your future comments polite and on-topic.
Also, just to be clear: I did not say iluvtintin was a fool; I merely suggested that carelessness with one's postings might detract from one's credibility.