To be honest, I’m not a fan.
I know that that is swimming against the tide, but it arrived too late in English for me to be youthfully smitten by it, it looked dated to my then eyes, and I always sort of lump it with “Broken Ear” and “America” as “books in my collection”, before heading of to the perhaps more light-weight, but to my taste more enjoyable, action adventures of later (chronologically) books. I prefer “Cigars”, and wonder if I’d have a higher opinion if “Lotus” had been revised to the same extent?
I mean I appreciate that it is an important work, developmentally, and marks a water-shed in the career of Hergé; I greatly enjoyed seeing the B&W version on display in Haarlem, and there are many, many exceptionally fine images in it (I particularly like a sketch of the old man and a car in the rain, which is beautiful) - but as book and story it leaves me at best unmoved. (But I like “Lake of Sharks”, so what do I know?) |