yamilah I put it to you that yamilah gave a reasonable answer within the allocated time...
Sorry, yamilah. Whilst your answer was certainly an entirely reasonable guess, it wasn't correct. Whatever the compilers of that on-line dictionary may believe, I'm sure that that the circus-type clown back stage in The Seven Crystal Balls can't accurately be described as a Harlequin. It'd be like describing a cricketer as a footballer and saying that "footballer" can be a term for all sportsmen. If you can produce a single professional circus-type clown (ie resembling that backstage clown in make-up and costume) who ever refers to himself or herself as a harlequin (at least one whose language is standard UK English), I'll be happy to eat my words and give you the point, I really will, but I don't think you'll be able to. It's quite common to find inaccurate definitions in dictionaries - the academics who compile these things often seem a bit out of their depth on non-academic specialisms - so no criticism of your own intelligence is implied by my refusal to accept your answer as correct.
Yamilah ...and a point is given after 72h, i.e. widely after the 48h time limit mentioned in the rules. And what about a penalty point for delay (rule 9)??
Sorry for inadvertantly losing track of the time and stretching the the 48 hour time limit. I sometimes find it hard to remember when I actually set a question, for which there's no excuse (although it would help us absent-minded UK Tintinologists if the forum's clock was set to GMT!). If Ed had nudged me with a 'Time's up, Balthazar - give the answer," I'd have done so, but I thought that giving a final easier clue and giving someone a chance to actually win the point would be more fun. I'm happy to let the quizmaster or moderator adjudicate on that one, though.
Yamilah Maybe Yamilah's personal handicap 'no answer for 24 hours after the question is set' is not enough? I'm not sure why you've started refering to yourself in the third person, Yamilah, but ignoring that, I do actually agree with the point that I think your making here - namely that the handicap on players who are way out in the lead is a bit illogical and unfair, or at least too severe.
Also (since I'm questioning the rulebook!), I'm not sure the new rule about only one attempted answer per player is actually going to help keep the quiz rolling. Keen quizzers coming back with a second or third attempted answer - each maybe a bit closer to the right answer than their last answer - sometimes seemed to help generate answers from other quizzers, and opened the thing out. I certainly never sensed this practice was ever a factor in putting more people off joining in. Anyway, that's just my opinion for what it's worth! |