calculite:
Bad idea, because Tintin is a traditional, old-fashioned character.
Tintin is a traditional old-fashioned character?
Only if you are born today! You should bear in mind when reading the books that they are actually contemporary, cutting-edge and packed full of modern detail
appropriate to the period in which they are written.
I think it does him more of a dis-service to consign him to the past, than to see him as a figure who was constantly revised and up-dated, to allow him to go from (for example) the open cock-pit planes of the 1920s in
Soviets, to the supersonic jet-age of
Flight 714.
calculite:
reducing him to a Happy Meal toy is degrading.
Again, that's to miss out on the fact that Tintin was used to advertise
lots of products for decades, and not just his own magazine and books.
Nutella spread,
Citroën cars, rain-wear, various varieties of chocolate, cakes and biscuits, cooking oil, yoghurt - the list goes on and on, in addition to which there were the collectible
Timbres Tintin/
Chèques Tintin, which were coupons to be collected and redeemed for various pieces of merchandise.
As Jelsemium says, there have been many toys and figurines before, of varying degrees of fidelity, and the MacDonald's toys are quite tasteful in comparison to some of those items!
calculite:
According to the trailers, Sakharine is a villain in the movie, so they've already botched it.
This is taking this thread off topic – you've expressed opinions about the movie in the review thread, so any further thoughts should be voiced there. Let's keep this on target, and stick to the Happy Meal toys, please.
On a further point, has anybody managed to make the secret-message reader in the bottom of the life-boat work? It's beaten me so far!