I'm a little surprised at the negativity towards Egmont: they seem to be keeping the books coming into the shops, albeit in trickles (a feat which Mammoth failed to do for a long time, when many bookshops seemed to go for months without), while Last Gasp seem to have done one print run of one facsimile, which while a good thing is hardly outstanding. I don't think we need to resort to stereotyping when discussing Tintin.
I'm also not so sure about Last Gasp, before people sing their praises too highly. The Tintin Shop seemed to think LG would be unlikely to want to bother with anything other than "Congo", as the subject matter/ controversial nature of the work apparently gave it a market in the US in its own right, and that's why they took it, not from an appreciation of Tintin and Hergé per se. It might explain why they don't make mention of any new facsimiles on their site.
Again, if LG *are* the publishers, they haven't met the deadlines for the B&W America, so why are they better than Egmonnt?
Frankly, I don't want to put down *any* company which is keeping the flame alive in English. Hard as it is to accept, maybe the books aren't as popular as they once were, and are a bit of a hard sell for anyone. I'm sure to many children Tintin is a TV character predominantly, and the books of any stripe are bought by middle-aged types (such as myself!) as gifts for children, or, mostly for themselves! So three cheers for Moulinsart, Casterman, Last Gasp, Egmont... (and for all of us!). |