snafu
As I previously mentioned in another thread, Herge carefully selected scenes that were panoramic, like movie posters, yet also convey the sense of the story.
That’s interesting, because it seems to me that Hergé often passed over some of the most exciting moments in favour of rather insipid “shots”; I’ve seen Hergé’s roughs for cover ideas which look like they might have had better “hooks” than the finished ones.
For example, there’s one for 714 which has a view from inside the cabin as it plunges over the island, looking out the porthole, which seems to cover a lot more of the book than the current one. There’s another for Black Island which looks over the shoulder of the “monster”, with Tintin pinned against the parapet of the castle: I love the lyrical cover of Tintin in the boat (it may be my favourite cover), but the excitement and dynamism of the unused version is more of a grabber - certainly more “cinematic”.
I’m thinking of this in terms of the information about how little time books have to succeed in the shops, which Michael Turner and Leslie Lonsdale-Cooper talked of at Greenwich. They contrived more dramatic titles for some of the English translations to make the books more attention-grabbing; I just wonder why some of the books don’t make more of an “effort” with their covers?
Just to be contrary, I will admit that Picaros has one of the more dynamic covers of the series, and it is still pretty poor, so it isn’t always a good row to hoe; also I realise that the series has sold like hot-cakes for decades now, so maybe Hergé doesn’t need my advice, and knew what he was doing… ;-) |